Systematic literature review on a relevant problem in public health

For this assignment, you will complete a Capstone Project in Public Health. (Healthcare Administration)

The capstone project will consist of a 23-page systematic literature review. On a relevant problem in public health. You have the option to select your own but it must follow these guidelines:
1. Be presented on a healthcare entity or institution that’s based in the United States
2. Be current (10 years or so)
3. Be on the topic of Healthcare Administration.
Example of Healthcare Administration Topics: Evaluation of healthcare facility protocol, business plan for healthcare agency, hospital readmission rates for cardiovascular disease, access to healthcare.

Your paper should us APA style formatting throughout the paper no exceptions!!

The MPH capstone should be a complete document consisting of the following sections:

1. Signature Page

2. Table of Contents

3. Abstract: The abstract should summarize the project and major findings in a concise paragraph.(should be about 250 words)

4. Introduction: The introduction should frame the public health issue in a few concise paragraphs. It should end with a statement of purpose. The statement of purpose should be a clear and concise statement of the primary objective(s) of the work. (2-4 pages)

5. Literature Review: The literature review should cover the major relevant literature (or all of the literature if there are few relevant publications) in a clear, concise manner. It should end with a research question or questions. (**25 professional journal** articles cited) (10 pages)

6. Methods (methodology): The methods section should explain, in a clear and organized fashion, how the project was conducted. The population under study should be clearly delineated, including the sampling frame, if appropriate, and sample sizes. The statistical methods and software used for analysis should be stated.(2-4 pages)

7. Results: The results section should contain tables, charts and figures, as appropriate, to display study results. The major findings should be reported in the text, referring the reader to the appropriate tables, charts, and figures. Results should be reported clearly and logically, without discussion. If not an empirical work, the results should present the qualitative or literature based information on which the paper’s argument is based. (2-4 pages)

8. Discussion/Conclusion: The discussion section should be a well-organized discussion of the major findings and should include comparison with previous studies and possible explanations for findings. The major limitations of the study and their possible effects on the study results should be presented. It should end with conclusions and recommendations. The conclusions/recommendations section should state the implications of the major findings and may include public health policy or suggestions as to how the finding informs a relevant public health policy issue. (5-9 pages)

9. References