Respond to question and use 2 sources i will provide options use 2

QUESTION:
Could be ethical for a professional to go beyond the limitations of their professional practice (i.e., role, scope, etc.) in order to provide for the needs of the client? If so, why, and to what extent—and why to that extent? If not, why not?
REQUIREMENTS:
Your paper must have all of the following features:
• Respond fully to the question
• Thoroughly discuss 2 articles assigned for the course from Unit 2, relevantly
and meaningfully relating the concepts and reasoning from the articles to the
paper topic
• Give cogent reasoning for your position
• Be typed (word-processed, printed hard copy), preferably double-sided,
WITHOUT a cover page or works cited page
• ONLY IF you consult other research outside of articles required for the course,
provide a bibliographic citation of those sources.
• To cite, use parenthetical citations: e.g., (Tweedy, 10)
SUGGESTIONS:
• If you choose not to use the Jewel Shuping case as an illustration, then identify
and use another real-world case.
• You could choose to respond to the question by considering the issues of either
client autonomy and its limits, professional-client relationships and their
boundaries, or both.
• Once you figure out your strategy for the paper, write brief summaries of the
articles you plan to use, then use those summaries as rough drafts for including the relevant parts in your paper (not the entire summaries, because the entire summary would not be relevant).
• Your paper should have a title that provokes interest and says something meaningful about the content of the paper.
• There is no wordcount or page number requirement, but as a guideline, expect the paper to need around 1000-1500 words (4-6 double-spaced pages of 12pt font)
• Use an appropriate font and don’t use freaking Arial because it’s an abomination