Research final paper – How social determinants impact type 2 diabetic women in Australia

assignment criterion

Academic assessment:(10%)
# Clear structure is used with headings and relevant sub-headings
# Provides a lucid introduction and conclusion
# Complies with normal academic standards of presentation, referencing (use of Vancouver or Harvard) and reference details
# Clearly written, with accurate spelling, grammar, sentence, and paragraph construction.

The final report (Literature review): (10%)
# Introduction: A brief overview of the issue and its significance
# Statement of the aim for the literature review
Methods (Search Strategy) (30%)
# Summary of databases, search engines, key words, timeframe of search, inclusion and exclusion criteria, data analysis and presentation

Findings and Discussion (45%)
# Summary of literature that was obtained and reviewed.
# Critical discussion of the themes from the literature review and appropriate referencing of the material used.
# Critical analysis and the relevance of the information in relation to aspects of public health or international development.
# Description of the main learnings from the literature review and the main implications for public health or international development practice
# Demonstration of a deep understanding of the evidence underpinning the selected public health/primary health care/health promotion/development issue.

# Demonstration of an ability to critically analyse and discuss the evidence and place the research into context.

# Demonstration of an ability to synthesise the evidence to discuss innovative applications to public health or international development practice.

Use of other literature to support further arguments and critical analysis (5%)