Case Scenario and Rubric

Scenario


You are the newly appointed director of human resource management for the police department of a city in the northeastern United States. Your organization has struggled to hire new police officers for some time. Your predecessor attempted to increase recruitment and selection of new officers by implementing an employee referral plan. However, the number of new officers hired through referrals has fallen short of hiring goals. The need for police officers intensified when your city’s newly elected mayor promised to lower crime by increasing the number of police patrols in high-crime areas. The police department has met the need for increased patrols by assigning existing police officers additional hours and paying overtime wages. As the number of hours worked and overtime payments increased over time, this practice—originally intended to be a short-term remedy—attracted unwanted attention.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Case Scenario and Rubric
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

A front-page article in your city’s newspaper has revealed that three police officers earned higher annual salaries than the mayor, due to excessive overtime. Stung and embarrassed by this disclosure, the mayor fired your predecessor and put you in his place. Both the mayor and your boss have given orders to “reduce overtime by hiring new police officers immediately!” This mandate requires you to plan and implement new strategies to hire 25 new police officers.

Fortunately, the former director of human resources left behind several documents that will help you perform these tasks. Refer to the following documents as directed when you perform the requirements below: (1) “Memo on Proposed Employee Referral Plan,” (2) “Job Description of City Police Officers,” and (3) “Data on Recruitment Sources and Methods.”

Assumptions


Requirements


Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Create a report (suggested length of 4–6 pages) in which you address the following:

A.  Analyze factors in the internal and external labor market that influence the supply of and demand for police officers by doing the following (refer to the scenario above and the attached “Memo on Proposed Employee Referral Plan” to complete these tasks):

1.  Discuss three factors that are influencing labor demand.

2.  Discuss three factors that are influencing labor supply.
 

B.  Design a recruitment plan for police officers by doing the following (refer to the task attachments and your knowledge of best practices to complete these tasks):

1.  Identify three recruitment objectives for your organization.

2.  Develop a recruitment strategy for attracting job applicants by doing the following:

a.  Determine the size of the applicant pool needed to produce 25 viable candidates (job offer-ready) using yield ratios and the recruitment data in the attached “Data on Recruitment Sources and Methods.”

b.  Recommend two types of individuals who should be targeted for recruitment (i.e., the target groups listed in the attached “Data on Recruitment Sources and Methods”).

i. Justify your recommendation.

c.  Describe two effective methods for reaching each  target group.

C.  Design a selection plan for police officers by doing the following:

1.  Recommend three appropriate selection methods for all  target candidates.

a.  Justify each  of your three recommendations.

2.  Describe two selection tests you will use to assess a candidate’s suitability for the job of police officer.

3.  Identify two background verification checks that should be used in the selection process including the following:

•  type of check

•  when the check should be conducted in the selection process

4.  Discuss four methods of evaluating the overall effectiveness of your recruitment and selection plans.
 

D.  When you use sources to support ideas and elements in a paper or project, provide acknowledgement of source information for any content that is quoted, paraphrased or summarized. Acknowledgement of source information includes:

•  Author

•  Date

•  Title

•  Location of information (e.g., publisher, journal, or website URL)

File Restrictions

File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z

Rubric


Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics):

Not Evident The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. Approaching Competence The candidate provides limited articulation of response. Competent The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.

A1:Labor Demand

Not Evident The candidate does not provide a discussion of any factors that are influencing labor demand. Approaching Competence The candidate provides an inadequate discussion of factors that are influencing labor demand. The discussion may be incomplete, poorly reasoned, unclearly explained, or lacking sufficient support. Competent The candidate provides a logical discussion of 3 factors that are influencing labor demand. The discussion is comprehensive, well-reasoned, clearly explained, and sufficiently supported.

A2:Labor Supply

Not Evident The candidate does not provide a discussion of any factors that are influencing labor supply. Approaching Competence The candidate provides an inadequate discussion of factors that are influencing labor supply. The discussion may be incomplete, poorly reasoned, unclearly explained, or lacking sufficient support. Competent The candidate provides a logical discussion of 3 factors that are influencing labor supply. The discussion is comprehensive, well-reasoned, clearly explained, and sufficiently supported.

B1:Recruitment Objectives

Not Evident The candidate does not identify any appropriate recruitment objectives for the organization. Approaching Competence The candidate inadequately identifies appropriate recruitment objectives for the organization. The identified recruitment objectives may be incomplete, unclear, or illogical. Competent The candidate identifies 3 appropriate recruitment objectives for the organization.

B2a:Applicant Pool Needed

Not Evident The candidate does not determine the size of the applicant pool needed to produce 25 viable candidates. Approaching Competence The candidate inaccurately determines the size of the applicant pool needed to produce 25 viable candidates using yield ratios and the recruitment data in Exhibit 3. Competent The candidate accurately determines the size of the applicant pool needed to produce 25 viable candidates using yield ratios and the recruitment data in Exhibit 3.

B2b:Recruitment Target Recommendation

Not Evident The candidate does not provide any recommendation of individuals who should be targeted for recruitment. Approaching Competence The candidate provides an inadequate recommendation of types of individuals who should be targeted for recruitment. The recommendation may be incomplete, unclear, illogical, or inappropriate in length and format. Competent The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation of 2 types of individuals who should be targeted for recruitment. The recommendation is clear, logical, and appropriate in length and format.

B2bi:Justification of Recommendation

Not Evident The candidate does not provide a justification of the recommendation of 2 types of individuals who should be targeted for recruitment. Approaching Competence The candidate provides a justification of the recommendation of 2 types of individuals who should be targeted for recruitment that lacks sufficient support. The justification may be poorly reasoned, unclearly explained, or lacking sufficient evidence. Competent The candidate provides a logical justification of the recommendation of 2 types of individuals who should be targeted for recruitment that is credible and well-reasoned. The justification is clearly explained, logically constructed, and sufficiently supported.

B2c:Description of Methods

Not Evident The candidate does not provide a description of methods for reaching each recommended target group. Approaching Competence The candidate provides an inadequate description of effective methods for reaching each recommended target group. The description may be incomplete, unclear, lacking sufficient detail, or inappropriate in length and format. Competent The candidate provides an adequate description of 2 effective methods for reaching each recommended target group. The description is comprehensive, clear, sufficiently detailed, and appropriate in length and format.

C1:Selection Methods

Not Evident The candidate does not provide a recommendation of any selection methods for all target candidates. Approaching Competence The candidate provides an inadequate recommendation of appropriate selection methods for all target candidates. The recommendation may be incomplete, unclear, illogical, or inappropriate in length and format. Competent The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation of 3 appropriate selection methods for all target candidates. The recommendation is clear, logical, and appropriate in length and format.

C1a:Justification of Selection method

Not Evident The candidate does not provide a justification of any of the recommendations. Approaching Competence The candidate provides a justification of the recommendations that lacks sufficient support. The justification may be poorly reasoned, unclearly explained, or lacking sufficient evidence. The justification may be incomplete (lacking support for each of the 3 recommendations). Competent The candidate provides a logical justification of each of the 3 recommendations. The justification is clearly explained, logically constructed, and sufficiently supported.

C2:Description of Selection Tests

Not Evident The candidate does not provide a description of any selection tests to assess a candidate’s suitability for the job of police officer. Approaching Competence The candidate provides an inadequate description of selection tests to assess a candidate’s suitability for the job of police officer. The description may be incomplete, unclear, lacking sufficient detail, or inappropriate in length and format. Competent The candidate provides an effective description of 2 selection tests to assess a candidate’s suitability for the job of police officer. The description is comprehensive, clear, sufficiently detailed, and appropriate in length and format.

C3:Background Verification Checks

Not Evident The candidate does not identify any background verification checks that should be used in the selection process. Approaching Competence The candidate inadequately identifies background verification checks that should be used in the selection process. The background verification checks may be incomplete (lacking one or both of the given points), illogical, or inaccurate. Competent The candidate identifies 2 background verification checks that should be used in the selection process including the given points.

C4:Evaluation of process Effectiveness

Not Evident The candidate does not provide a discussion of any methods of evaluating the overall effectiveness of their recruitment and selection plans. Approaching Competence The candidate provides an inadequate discussion of methods of evaluating the overall effectiveness of their recruitment and selection plans. The discussion may be incomplete, poorly reasoned, unclearly explained, or lacking sufficient support. Competent The candidate provides a logical discussion of 4 methods of evaluating the overall effectiveness of their recruitment and selection plans. The discussion is comprehensive, well-reasoned, clearly explained, and sufficiently supported.

D:Sources

Not Evident There is evidence of quoted, paraphrased or summarized content without acknowledgement of source information. This level is also appropriate if task instructions require the candidate to quote, paraphrase or summarize content from a source to complete the assessment, and this has not yet been done. Approaching Competence The candidate provides required acknowledgement of source information for quoted, paraphrased and summarized content. However, source information is incomplete or inaccurate with respect to author, date, title and/or the location of the information (e.g., publisher, journal or website URL). Competent The candidate provides source information for all quoted, paraphrased and summarized content. Source information appears to include accurate and complete acknowledgement of source information regarding the author, date, title and location of the information (e.g., publisher, journal or website URL). This level is also appropriate if there is no evidence of quoted, paraphrased or summarized content, and it is not required by the instructions.

Grab 16% Discount On This Paper
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Choose Us

Quality Papers

ACME Homework provides the best top-grade academic writing services in compliance with our customers’ instructions. Have your paper written by a certified professional online college homework help writer to produce only high-quality essays with zero plagiarism.

Professional Academic Writers

You can now choose from a pool of online college homework help writers. Choose your writer and have them write the best content for you. ACME Homework has, over the years, secured a team of the most reliable, experienced, and qualified writers. You can, therefore, trust that your assignment is in good hands.

Affordable Prices

We know that students have very limited budgets. And for that, we always strive to provide only the best, most affordable online college homework help services to our customers. Our goal is to provide top-quality assignment help services to all customers at the lowest, most affordable prices.

On-Time delivery

At Acmehomework.com, we pay strict attention to deadlines. We recommend you to check out clients’ reviews for assurance that we will complete your assignments within the set deadlines. You can, therefore, trust that your paper will be done within and before the set deadline. Until now, we have not missed a single deadline.

100% Originality

Our Acmehomework.com homework helper experts write only 100% original and plagiarism-free content for all of our clients. We also have a Quality Assurance Department team that goes through all work submitted by our writers multiple times. You can, therefore, rest assured that any signs of plagiarized or unoriginal content will be rejected before it reaches your portal.

Customer Support 24/7

Acmehomework.com expert writers are always available 24/7 for customers who need assistance with using our website. You don’t have to check your watch the next time you want to have your assignment written. Our customer support is always available round the clock and ready to listen to your queries. Feel free to contact us via the Chat window or support email: support@acmehomework.com.

Try it now!

Grab 16% Discount On This Paper

We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

For years now, Acmehomework.com has stood as a leader in providing its customers with the best online college homework help service in the industry. And all you have to do is provide us with the details of your order. Leave everything else to us. We’ve always got you covered.

Essays

Essay Writing Services

Since we launched, Acmehomework.com deserved the best online “college homework help status” thanks to our essay ordering, writing, and delivery process. We deliver nothing but excellence in our results. Our essay writing services include impeccable grammar, zero-plagiarism, proper structure, and conformance to guidelines.

Admissions

Admission and Business Papers

Our top-quality online college homework help services guarantee that you will be accepted into your desired university. You just need to fill out your admission and business papers, and our team of online homework help workers will handle the rest. We will help you achieve and secure the best positions in your admissions forms.

Editing

Editing and Proofreading

At Acmehomework.com, we have a skilled writing and editing team that’s dedicated to creating, editing, and restructuring for all types of papers. Our online college homework help editing and proofreading team will check, paraphrase, and correct any grammar mistakes on your paper before submitting the final document to you.

Coursework

Technical Papers

At Acmehomework.com, we pride ourselves in having writers in almost all fields, even the most technical ones. You never have to worry about your paper being too technical for our certified online college homework help writers to handle. ACME Homework’s team of writers can handle even the most complex writers. We will match your paper to the most competent writer that we believe will handle your paper the best way possible.

                                                                                     Place Order